Background Information
Generic
boundaries and sectional delimitations in Croton: Morphologically,
Croton is distinguished from related groups by staminal
filaments that are distinctly inflexed in bud. Most species
are also characterized by thyrsoid inflorescences, indument
of stellate or lepidote hairs, nonarticulated lactifers with
clear or reddish to yellow latex, and reduced pistillate petals.
On this basis, Webster merged segregate genera like Crotonopsis,
Eremocarpus, and Julocroton back into Croton
(Webster 1992, 1993). Likewise, taxa originally described
in Croton but lacking key synapomorphies like inflexed
stamens and stellate hairs, have been removed and placed in
other genera (e.g. Esser & van Welzen 2001 for Croton
nanus, now Colobocarpos).
Identifying the sister
group to Croton is key to understanding whether the
diversity of the genus is phylogenetically significant or
whether it is a taxonomic artifact (Sanderson & Donoghue
1996, Sanderson & Wojciechowski 1996). Webster (1994)
placed Croton in tribe Crotoneae together with African
Mildbraedia, Asian Paracroton (= Fahrenheitia),
and the Cuban endem ic
Moacroton. However, the tribal and subtribal delimitations
within the inaperturate Crotonoideae are avowedly 'soft' (G.
Webster, pers. comm.), and therefore a judicious sampling
of potential sister groups needs to be included in a molecular
analysis of Croton. For example, Webster (1994) noted
that South America Sagotia (placed by him in tribe Codiaeae)
is morphologically similar to Croton, and Nowicke (1994)
found that pollen of Sagotia racemosa has very large lumina,
a character shared only with Croton matourensis among
the 69 species of Crotonoideae she sampled. Moacroton
species have all the main Croton characteristics except
for its few stamens with short, erect filaments in bud. Molecular
studies could show that it is simply a distinctive clade nested
within Croton, or alternatively, it could prove to
be Croton's closest outgroup.
The 19th century classification
of Croton by Mueller (1866, 1873) was a highly artificial
one, so Webster (1993) set out to revise the division of the
genus into sections that would supposedly better reflect their
phyletic relationships. He based his system on differences
in trichome types; presence of glands on the leaves, stipules,
and/or sepals; degree of branching in the styles; aestivation
of the sepals of the female flowers; presence or absence of
bisexual cymules at the base of the inflorescence; opposite
vs. alternate leaves; and the degree of petal reduction in
male and female flowers. The result was a realignment of the
genus into 40 sections.
Some sections are very distinctive and will almost surely
prove to be monophyletic, but there are serious problems with
many Old World taxa, which do not fit easily into these sections
(H. J. Esser, P. Forster, and G. Webster, pers. comm.). The
largest sections, Cascarilla and Velamea, are among the least
coherent, and Cascarilla has been circumscribed to include
taxa from three continents. Webster's system is not always
predictive of the placement of newly discovered species (e.g.
Croton scutatus, Berry & Gaskin 1998), but it can
be very useful as a functional way to subdivide the New World
species, which account for most of the species diversity in
Croton (as in Murillo's 1999 synopsis of the Colombian
species). For now, Webster's sections are the best available
framework of hypotheses for future phylogenetic studies.
Regional diversity and
floristics of Croton: A number of researchers have
made valuable advances in floristic work in Croton
in recent years. Areas covered in the Neotropics include Costa
Rica (Burger & Huft 1995), Panama (Webster 1988), Cuba
(Borhidi & Muñiz 1977), Hispaniola, (Liogier 1986),
southern Venezuela (Berry 1999), and Santa Catarina, Brazil
(Smith et al. 1988). Radcliffe-Smith (1988) completed a treatment
of Croton in tropical East Africa, and he is now updating
Leandri's (1939) treatment of Malagasy Croton, which
will approach 200 species. H.-J. Esser (pers. comm.) has completed
a manuscript for Flora of Thailand, and next he will revise
Croton for Flora Malesiana. Paul Forster in Queensland
is revising the Australian species of Croton. Other
groups are now studying parts or all of Croton in Mexico,
Colombia, and Brazil. These are all basically 'bottom-up'
approaches that suffer to varying degrees from the lack of
a broader regional or phylogenetic context. On the other hand,
virtually all of these researchers are interested in collaborating
on this project, and they can often facilitate the location
of fresh material for molecular and cytological studies.
Although Croton
is most typical of semiarid habitats, almost any habitat in
the tropics will likely yield one or more Croton species,
including salt-water beaches, deserts, cloud forest, lowland
rain forest, and even seasonally flooded forests. Certain
areas are hotbeds of diversity in Croton and are areas
where field work should be focused. In the West Indies, Cuba
has 51 species of Croton (33 of them endemic), covering
14 sections, as well as the seven species of the closely related
Moacroton (Borhidi & Muñiz 1977) and the
monotypic Cubacroton. Hispaniola has 45 species in
12 sections and is nearly as diverse. Even the southern U.S.
is surprisingly diverse in Croton, with 42 species
in 14 sections. The largest country count is for Brazil, with
356 species in 26 sections; of these, 172 species in 21 sections
are found in four states of southeastern Brazil, making it
the most species-rich area for the genus in the world. These
figures are from our Croton database, which began last
year with a download of the data in Govaerts et al. (2000)
World Checklist of the Euphorbiaceae. The database is being
continually updated with input from our Croton collaborators,
and via customized queries we can generate similar data for
any country or region in the world.
Morphological characters
in Croton: Among the difficulties in arriving at a
satisfactory systematic arrangement within Croton,
Webster (1993) cited the 'pervasiveness of parallelism and
convergence' in many of the classical morphological characters.
Examples include bifid vs. multifid styles, stellate vs. lepidote
trichomes, and leaves with or without basal glands. It is
indeed a challenge to try to determine which of the potential
morphological characters can be used in a phylogenetic study
of the genus, but part of the solution is to reevaluate and
atomize the characters in a way that may avoid what can be
called 'superficial homoplasy.' One example of this are the
stellate to lepidote trichomes that are so characteristic
of Croton. In a detailed SEM study of foliar trichomes
in the genus, Webster et al. (1996) demonstrated that there
are not two, but five basic trichome types in Croton
leaves - stellate, fasciculate, multiradiate/rosulate, dendritic,
and lepidote. Additional kinds of trichomes can be found on
different parts of the flowers and inflorescences. In a somewhat
extreme case, Berry (1999) documented how Croton matourensis
from the Guiana Shield has different trichome types on different
parts of organs (leaf midvein vs. surface), at different developmental
stages (juvenile vs. mature), or on different parts of the
plant (sun vs. shade leaves). Ricarda Riina, a student in
Berry's lab, demonstrated in a plant morphology class project
that an undescribed species from Venezuela has five different
trichome morphologies on different surfaces (upper leaf, lower
leaf, sepals, petals, and capsules). Most species are actually
quite constant in their vestiture, but the point is that one
must break down a character like trichomes into the proper
components and do so for different parts of the plants and
at different developmental stages.
Foliar glands have been
used in sectional classifications, usually as present or absent,
or on stipules vs. lamina. Jose & Inamdar (1989) found
five kinds of extrafloral nectaries on one species, Croton
bonplandianus. Distinguishing between petiolar, pedicellate,
stipular, bracteolar, and laminar nectaries and whether they
are discoid, stipitate, or globular will better atomize this
character for other species and sections. Stigma branching
is also more complicated than simply bifid vs. multifid. There
are several elaborate stigmatic variations in Croton,
such as the unusual fan-shaped divisions of the stigmas in
sect. Astraea, which may be a good synapomorphy for that section.
With fairly reduced flowers
to begin with, it is not clear what significance there is
for the kinds of floral variations that have been used in
Croton classification. Webster (1993) thought that
species with well-developed female petals were primitive in
the genus, but in the related genus Moacroton, six
species are apetalous and the seventh has petals as large
as the sepals (Borhidi 1991). Several sections of Croton
are characterized by inflated calyces with connate sepals,
or else by 'reduplicate-valvate' sepals (folded back and outwards),
and we would like to know if the different groups share a
common ancestry. Seed and fruit characters have barely been
explored in Croton, but Webster (1993) believes they
could supply informative characters within the genus.
With a more effective
discrimination of the vegetative and floral characters that
have been used in the past and inclusion of little used characters
such as seeds, we can make a better attempt at evaluating
the phylogenetic usefulness of morphological characters in
Croton. Also, we
should take the approach of Evans et al. (2000), who explored
incongruence between morphological and molecular datasets
in Commelinaceae by identifying which particular morphological
characters contributed most to the conflicts between datasets.
Creation of the Croton
Research Network and web page. Early in 2001, Rafael Govaerts
from Kew provided us with an electronic output of the Croton
section of their World Checklist of the Euphorbiaceae publication
(Govaerts et al. 2000). We have modified this into an Access
database and added to it a series of geographical queries
and determined sectional assignments for hundreds of previously
unassigned species (up from 500 out of 1278 taxa to 700).
We have also incorporated images (live plants, type specimens,
photomicrographs, and SEMs) contributed by Brian Smith from
his Ecuadorian sect. Cyclostigma revision (in prep.). Based
on specimen and literature analysis, as well as consultations
with local specialists, we regularly update the taxonomy and
geographical distribution data in the database. In July 2001,
Berry visited Kew Botanic Gardens to confer with the resident
Euphorbiaceae specialists, Petra Hoffman and Alan Radcliffe-Smith.
There was not enough time to examine herbarium material on
this visit, but Berry then spent three days in the Paris herbarium
reviewing New World Croton collections and making digital
photographs of several hundred type specimens, including the
important Humboldt & Bonpland collection. Most of these
are now available for viewing on this web site, and more will
be added as they are processed. For now, a static version
of the Kew checklist is available on the website, as well
as a synopsis
of Webster's 1993 sectional revision of the genus.
Berry
has continued to develop the Croton Research Network
through personal visits and by communicating updates on this
project. Two senior researchers are key to this collaboration,
because they have devoted so much of their lives to Euphorbiaceae
research, and a considerable part of it on Croton.
They are Grady
Webster (emeritus, UC-Davis) and Alan
Radcliffe-Smith (emeritus, Kew Botanic Gardens), and both
have begun to share their expertise and materials with us.
A junior, but equally key collaborator -- especially for the
molecular component of our project, is Kenneth
Wurdack, at the Cullman Program of the New York Botanical
Gardens and finishing his Ph.D. at UNC. Ken has extensively
sampled the traditional euphorb genera using rbcL and trnL-F,
and he has a keen interest in Croton. He plans to postdoc
this year at the Smithsonian Institution and will continue
to work with us on the molecular phylogeny of Croton.
Two of Berry's graduate students at UW-Madison, Ricarda
Riina and Benjamin
van Ee, have contributed significantly to the preliminary
results and are eager to develop their doctoral theses as
part of this project.
Other persons who are
contributing to the Croton Research Network include:
Hans-Joachim
Esser (Harvard University, southeast Asian Croton),
Petra
Hoffmann (Kew, Euphorbiaceae and Madagascar), Brian
Smith (UC-Davis, systematics of section Cyclostigma),
José
Pirani and his doctoral student Letícia Ribes de
Lima (Universidade de São Paulo, Brazilian Croton),
Inés
Cordeiro (Instituto Botânico, São Paulo,
section Julocroton), Ricardo
Secco (Museu Goeldi, Belem, Brazil, Amazonian Croton),
Paul
I. Forster (Brisbane, Australian Croton), José
Murillo (Colombian Croton), Marta
Martínez-Gordillo (Mexican section Barhamia), Mark
Olson (UNAM, Mexican Euphorbiaceae), and William
Burger (Field Museum of Natural History, Central American
Croton). There are other specialists we plan to contact
(e.g. Steven Ginzbarg, Victor Steinmann, Emily Lott, Willem
Punt, P. van Welzen, among others), but we wish to secure
further funding before committing too many people to this
endeavor. |